Business Wikipedia Monitoring for Companies and Executives

Business · $399 per year

Monitor your page, your executives, and your competition

Five Wikipedia pages, watched continuously. Your company article, the people who represent it, and the competitors whose page often changes before their news does.

Your monitoring suite probably does not watch Wikipedia

Most comms teams assume it is covered. Media monitoring platforms are built to surface new content: an article published, a post made, a mention appearing. A Wikipedia edit is none of those. It is a change to a page that was already indexed, and it produces no new URL to find.

That is why a rewritten paragraph in your company article can sit there for days while a dashboard you pay five figures for reports nothing at all.

What companies watch with five pages

Your company

The article that feeds your knowledge panel, and the first thing an analyst, a journalist or a candidate reads.

Your executives

A chief executive with an article has a second reputation surface, and it is edited by people who do not work for you.

Your competition

An acquisition, a funding round or a lawsuit often lands in a competitor's article before it reaches the trade press.

A year of edits on one article

The quiet months are the argument for automating this. Nobody checks a page every day for a year.

Byte differential, one company article Sample data, shown to illustrate the view.

Bytes added Bytes removed

+2,500 +1,250 −1,250 −2,500 Sep: 180 added, 60 removed, 2 edits Oct: 420 added, 120 removed, 4 edits Nov: 260 added, 40 removed, 3 edits Dec: 140 added, 310 removed, 3 edits Jan: 610 added, 90 removed, 6 edits Feb: 340 added, 220 removed, 5 edits Mar: 2,410 added, 1,847 removed, 14 edits Apr: 520 added, 160 removed, 5 edits May: 300 added, 80 removed, 3 edits Jun: 180 added, 45 removed, 2 edits Jul: 760 added, 240 removed, 7 edits Aug: 410 added, 130 removed, 4 edits SepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAug −1,847 bytes in one revision
Byte differential by month
MonthAddedRemovedNetEdits
Sep 180 60 +120 2
Oct 420 120 +300 4
Nov 260 40 +220 3
Dec 140 310 −170 3
Jan 610 90 +520 6
Feb 340 220 +120 5
Mar 2,410 1,847 +563 14
Apr 520 160 +360 5
May 300 80 +220 3
Jun 180 45 +135 2
Jul 760 240 +520 7
Aug 410 130 +280 4

Against the alternatives

How each way of monitoring a Wikipedia page compares
Method Delivers itself Shows the change Keeps working Setup
Wikipedia Watchlist Yes No No Account, then two settings tabs
Page history RSS No Yes No A reader, plus a bridge to email
Google Alerts Yes No No Minimal
WikiMonitor (this product) Yes Yes Yes A page URL and an email address

Every row is checkable. The notes and sources are on the full comparison.

What Business includes

$399per year

Five pages

  • Five Wikipedia pages
  • Everything in Personal
  • Route alerts to more than one recipient
  • Watch competitors as well as your own article
  • Cancel any time

Start monitoring Compare every tier

Start monitoring now.

Tell us the page and where alerts should go. We confirm the article is the right one and take you straight to checkout.

Payment is handled by Stripe. Nothing on this page touches your card details. Need more pages than the Agency tier, or invoicing? Talk to us.

Questions

We already pay for media monitoring. Does that not cover Wikipedia?

Check what your suite actually watches. Media monitoring is built to find new mentions across news and social. A Wikipedia edit is a change to a page the index already has, which is a different signal, and Wikipedia coverage is rarely something these suites claim in writing.

Which five pages should we watch?

The most common set is the company article, the founder or chief executive, one or two competitors, and whichever subsidiary or product has its own page. Competitors matter more than people expect, because an edit to their article often arrives before the news does.

Can alerts go to more than one person?

Yes. Business routes each page to whoever should see it, so legal does not have to read every citation cleanup and comms does not miss the one that matters.

Do you edit or respond on our behalf?

No, we detect and report, which keeps you clear of the conflict-of-interest problem that has caught out firms who do.